Of all the children killed in the 23
richest countries by firearms 87% are American.
As the number of guns available on the
market has increased over the past three decades the number of mass
killings and killings in general has increased. According to Harvard
University School of Public Health more people die from gun homicides
in areas of higher rates of gun ownership.
Gun laws in Connecticut, even though it
is claimed they are some of the toughest in the nation are toothless wonders.
Connecticut did not do everything “right” when it came to gun
control. They do not have strict gun control laws as the
conservatives would have you believe.
In fact, in Connecticut you can own an
assault-style rifle with a grenade launcher. Yep you heard me right...this is allowed in Connecticut. If this is legal then
how in the world can we call their laws “STRICT”?
Strict means precise or exact, kept
within narrowly specific limits. Strict does not have loopholes.
There is no state in the nation that has “strict” gun laws on the
books. The NRA has fought vehemently to keep any form of strict
regulation off the books everywhere.
So the argument on the other side
claiming strict gun laws didn't prevent the massacre of little
children is without merit because there is no such thing as a strict
gun law in our nation. We do know that guns are the problem. In China
a crazed man entered a school with a knife and carved up over 20
children. None of them died. They may be scared for life but none of
them died.
Why should any civilian be allowed to
own a weapon with a detachable clip? Why should any civilian be
allowed to own a weapon with an extended magazine. These devices are
designed for combat, not hunting and not protection. i looked up the
Connecticut laws and there are no restrictions on magazine capacity. NONE
If you have no laws on the books
mandating a restriction upon magazine capacity anyone can modify a
weapon or buy one that takes a magazine. States claim they have the
toughest laws on the books and yet they are smoke screens. If the
laws don't ban magazines and clips they aren't tough laws. You can't
have a tough law if they are allowed.
i was reading some comments on Red
State and the writer was saying that in Massachusetts they passed one
of the “toughest” gun laws in the nation but that “the decade since
the laws were passed, firearm-related crime has increased
dramatically. Gun-related deaths alone have increased by 68%, and
gun-related assault injuries have increased by 72%. Emergency room
visits due to gun-related assaults have increased by a whopping
222%.” The writer goes on to say that liberals ignore this even though the laws are quote "tough".
In fact liberals restate those facts
all the time and point out that allowing clips and magazines on
weapons should be outlawed. Liberals don't want to take away anyone's
guns. Keep your guns just ban the magazines, clips and assault
weapons. Enough fire power will still keep you safe or accompany you
on a hunting trip by allowing no more than ten rounds to a weapon.
Many on the other side argue that
Israel and Switzerland are gun friendly but don't have the same
numbers of killings as we do. Well to bust another myth both
countries are actually limited as to who can own guns. You don't have
a right to own a gun, you must have a reason to own a gun. Every six
months you have to go back to the issuing authority to prove you
still have a reason to own a gun. In Switzerland because everyone is
supposed to do military duty they used to let you take the guns home,
now you have to leave them in a depot, the same is true in Israel,
unless you live in a settlement. Statistics have shown that if guns
are in the home the odds go up for accidents, suicide and murder and
in fact in Israel they have proven that the rates of suicide have
dropped since they stopped allowing guns to go home.
And if you don't train to use a gun regularly you loose the ability to act in as short a time as two months. Even those who are trained can't always act when in dangerous situations. So don't think just because you own a gun you can protect yourself.
Lets not let another moment go by without addressing our unreasonable addiction to firearms that can massacre untold numbers of innocent children and adults in moments.
And if you don't train to use a gun regularly you loose the ability to act in as short a time as two months. Even those who are trained can't always act when in dangerous situations. So don't think just because you own a gun you can protect yourself.
Lets not let another moment go by without addressing our unreasonable addiction to firearms that can massacre untold numbers of innocent children and adults in moments.
See ya tomorrow
No comments:
Post a Comment